It Is Obvious That “Someone” Wants Us To Go At War With Russia. It Is Less Obvious That The Very Same “Someone” Wants Us To Lose That War. UK To Install Wind Farms That Block Jet Fighters Interceptors. Who’s That Someone? Maybe It is Really King Charles With Kate Middleton

I COPY & PASTE THE NUMBER *N ARTICLE ABOUT ANOTHER EUROPEAN WESTERN NATION, UK THIS TIME, DOING WEIRD THINGS AGAINST ITSELF AND SELF-SABOTAGING. SELF-SABOTAGE LATELY HAS BECOME THE NEW NORMALITY IN EUROPE & USA. PERHAPS NOT IN AUSTRALIA, I CAN’T SAY, HERE IT IS: You have to do the war against Russia, help Kiev, NATO Vs Russia and get ready too, but… the very same people who are hardliners against Putin and criticise Trump for not being hardliner enough, the ones who go to Kiev, the Princess Annes, the Burnhams… then sabotage and I wrote SABOTAGE the British Defense System with the now notorious fucking Net Zero Targets that slow down the Nation.

Not knowing who’s behind all this, we have to get angry with who’s in front of us, on front stage. Kate Middleton, King Charles, Princess Anne, Burnham are in front line with Zelensky and against Putin and promoting Net Zero – Schroeder instead went to Putin’s birthday party, bravo Gerhard – and since it’s they in front of us we get angry with them and their Tom Cruise. Riddle me this otherwise. We can’t really arrest Satan, if you can arrest Lord Vader you arrest him, it’s useless to go on thinking “yeh but he’s a puppet of Palpatine…” you arrest the puppet and then also the puppet master if you can, eventually.

Many people say “Yeah, but who are the dark forces behind…?” Kate Middleton is the dark force in front of you. The fact that you cannot get to the mythical Palpatine doesn’t mean you don’t arrest Vader. Stop using this “dark force behind” mantra as an excuse not to fight and stop the enemy right in front of you.

Net Zero promoters and the enemies of Putin and allies of Zelesnky are the enemy in front of us. They have no right to push us at war with Russia and without gasoline indeed, and with their wind farms blocking the radar interceptors, they have to be stopped starting with the Royals, starting with the ones who come out.

SOURCE GB-NEWS

Net Zero drive leaves hole in Britain’s defences as wind turbines could BLOCK Russian jet-tracking radars

By Oliver Partridge Published: 09/10/2026 – 10:14

The proposed Hope Moor Wind Farm has been fast-tracked under the national planning process for major energy infrastructure.

The Ministry of Defence has warned that plans for a 23-turbine wind farm in the Yorkshire countryside could interfere with military radar systems used to detect hostile aircraft and incoming missiles.

The proposed Hope Moor Wind Farm, featuring turbines some 200 metres tall, has been fast-tracked under the national planning process for major energy infrastructure.

The final decision rests with Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh, although the scheme has raised national security concerns over the Government’s drive to expand renewable energy under Net Zero.

In a letter to planning officials, the MoD’s Defence Infrastructure Organisation warned that the development would cause “unacceptable interference” to radar systems at RAF Leeming and Brizlee Wood.

The former, which operates air traffic control radar, is 19 miles from the proposed site, while the latter hosts air defence radar 67 miles away.

The MoD said the impact could undermine the RAF’s ability to protect British airspace, warning the development could prevent the service “from effectively performing its primary function of air defence of the United Kingdom”.

Military officials say rotating turbine blades can create radar clutter and generate misleading signals resembling fast-moving aircraft – making genuine threats harder to distinguish, and compromising the detection of low-flying aircraft.

During training exercises, some aircraft operate at altitudes of just 250ft, and would be directly obscured by the signals.

The MoD said: “Consider a low-flying object near a wind farm. The ability to at first detect and then track is the major objective of air surveillance. Any disruption caused by excessive clutter may adversely affect national security and/or safety.”

The warning comes amid tensions between the MoD and the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, over the placement of renewable energy developments.

The Government changed planning rules in December to allow onshore wind farms to qualify as nationally significant infrastructure projects, enabling them to bypass the conventional local planning system.

Hope Moor would be built on open moorland south of Barnard Castle and north of Richmond in County Durham. Developer Fred Olsen Renewables says the scheme could supply enough electricity for some 135,000 homes, supporting the UK’s net zero ambitions.

However, the project has also faced criticism from residents and politicians concerned about damage to the landscape near the Yorkshire Dales, and potential harm to surrounding peatland.

Lord Botham, the former England cricketer leading the Not One Moor campaign, argued the Government is placing environmental ambitions ahead of defence.

Meanwhile, councillor Angus Thompson said the MoD’s intervention strengthened the case for abandoning the project, and argued existing concerns over landscape damage and electricity costs had now been compounded.

Fred Olsen Renewables said it remained committed to addressing the concerns, confirming it would “continue to work with” the MoD to mitigate potential effects on military operations, radar, telecommunications and flight paths.

Euan Hutchison, the company’s UK development director, said the project remained at an early stage, and that national security was a priority.

A spokesman for the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said all onshore wind developments undergo rigorous planning assessments covering defence, security, environmental impacts and community concerns.

The department failed to comment further while the Hope Moor application remains under consideration.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

- / 5
Thanks for voting!