Marina and PierSilvio Berlusconi vetoed the Center-Right Alliance with General Vannacci’s new Party National Future, then PierSilvio also fired rightwing journalist who had been loyal to his father Silvio, Paolo DelDebbio from his television ReteQuattro, hmm… the new Berlusconis after the death of Silvio actually demand loyalty to Zelensky as a sine qua non for staying in the Center-Rightwing Coalition, that very Zelensky their father Silvio despised while admiring Putin instead, then they want openness to gays, to trans people, to migrants, to Muslims, and even to euthanasia, “the end of life,” the little cross if you want to die, “Sign here, Madam, and you won’t suffer,” so they euthanized the Center-Rightwing actual Government Coalition the so called CDX: they killed it off completely.
In the last few days, we’ve only been reading news of people switching from the CDX to Vannacci’s Party—at least in Italy—the program… the new CDX Program is the same as that of the Democratic Party or of Emma Bonino (gays, trans, migrants, euthansia etc.) with the difference that they want the appointment of different Judges, less powerful and less invasive—that’s what Nordio was for, whom I had recommended at the beginning not knowing how would he end up doing, by the way—and yes, they also want tax crimes to be considered minor issues or non-serious, if possible classified as non-felony (because they’re rich of course). Pier thought he was cunning, but really no one fell for it: the PD and the 5 Star Movement disagree on the issue of Judges and Tax Crimes, Trojans, Wiretapping Powers for the Public Investigators, the Police etc. For the rest, there’s no longer any difference between this new CDX Monster and the Democratic Part and /or Emma Bonino (an abortionist extremist, pro euthanasia pro EU, pro everything freemasonry wants she does it, she practiced illegal aboritons in the seventies and then campaigned on legalizing it and won, it’s a long time absolute Masonness). Add to that, the outrage over Vannacci was sensational like a Cabaret: if they still did it, being outraged over General Roberto, who, after all, comes from the Modena Academy, whereas they kept Bossi in their political home, that is… Vannacci is a Gentleman, a Gentleman who likes to talk clearly, but he’s still a person of a certain social standing; Bossi was a lout.
So there’s no need to be outraged, whether on the Russia and Ukraine issue or on migrants, gays, trans people, or euthanasia, the National Future’s program is much more similar to Forza Italia’s when Silvio Berlusconi was in power. When someone from National Future becomes Mayor of Milan, they’ll finally dedicate the airport to Silvio Berlusconi probably.
Let’s see the other dandy, the good Italy that counts, the banker’s son, the LUISS economist who also enrolled, has just enrolled in Vannacci’s Party because “if as a child my idol was Jim Morrison, now only General Vannacci exists” sorry “Only Biagio Antonacci (it’s a comedian’s song, see below)
Antonio Maria Rinaldi (Rome, February 27, 1955) Wikipedia Source
Born in Rome in 1955, his father was the banker Rodolfo Rinaldi, president of the Banco di Santo Spirito, vice president of BNL, and European representative of Chase Manhattan Bank.[2] His mother, Isabella Rossini, is a distant descendant of the composer Gioachino Rossini.[2][3] He is married and the father of two children.[4]
Graduated in Economics and Business in 1979 from LUISS Guido Carli University in Rome, with a thesis in economic and financial planning entitled “The Causes of Diversification and the Evolution of the Organizational Structures of the FIAT Group,” he worked at various credit institutions, such as Banco di Roma, American Service Bank, and Fideuram (1980-85), and held positions as an official at CONSOB and as a manager at Eni (1986-1994). In particular, he was General Manager of SOFID, the financial company that was ENI’s parent company (1990-1994).[4] In 1994, he was a member of the board of directors of ENAV.[4]
A student of Paolo Savona[5], from 2012 to 2018 he was a contract university lecturer in political economy and corporate finance at the Link Campus University in Rome, the University of Molise in Campobasso, and the University of Pescara “Gabriele d’Annunzio”[4][6]. He is known to the public for having been a guest on various television talk shows, in which he has always expressed critical positions towards the single European currency[5]. Rinaldi is a contributor to the website Scenarieconomici.it.[4]
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
I am intrigued by the possibility that Vannacci wins the elections and goes to the Quirinale to present a Government Team and presents Rinaldi the dandy, the LUISS economist, the son of the banker, Chase Manhattan, something out of an American movie with the skyscraper in New York, etc. see above, as Minister of Economy… I want to see if Mattarella will refuse him like he refused Savona. Because we’re below Greece, we’re no longer above Spain. Giorgia The Melona, with her team of ignorant, lying idiots, He President Mattarella let them into the Ministries, but rejected Savona. He didn’t even want Giuseppe Conte at the beginning because Conte was too educated and wasn’t Mario Draghi. His bosses must have told him not to let good skilled people into the Ministries so as not to disturb Europe, and Giorgia had no problem with that. Remember the Cinderella Horror?
Will he let Rinaldi in? And if not, what will the General do?
One of the first things that puzzled me about Salvini was how he was able to vote for Mattarella for the Quirinale a second time after the latter rejected Paolo Savona as Minister of Economy. These people have given in on everything. Change is coming, there are many parties after all.
If we wanted to vote for Emma Bonino, we knew there was a party called +Europa, the Radicals, etc. The PD. People no longer understand why they have to vote for the League, Salvini, Zaia, Tajani, FdI… they’ve lost their identity, their programmatic unity (there’s no program anymore, there are decisions made day by day completely outside of the program), while for example, National Future and DSP offer programmatic unity and programmatic clarity. If you vote for them, you know what you’re voting for.