If you want to know who are the pious souls who are accusing Mark Zuckerberg – who in the movie looks much older and idiotic stiff than he really is – they’re accusing him of … see above, of basically letting us talk, the radical whites who don’t want to shut up in front of the black lives matter & gays and trans offending them, well, these pious souls accusing Zuckerberg are:
THE FUCKING MURDOCH OWNED WALL STREET JOURNAL
THE MAFIA RUN SONY PICTURE
Sony that is a 100% mafia run company that likes to do gay, trans, mafia movies and videogames against the cops and the fake Rightwing, owned by the fake Republican Lachlan Murdoch WSJ, they accuse Zuckerberg, of letting us talk, of having broken their monopoly on information and opinion and mass culture.
They are not accusing the Black Lives Matter whose members once wrote to me they wanted to drug me and rape me so I would produce a fucking black child, that wasn’t hate speech… of course, in the movie the fat obese black woman is of course “good” why in these movies the black obese are supposed to be all good, btw? The Mamies of Gone With the Wind 2026 version, fuck off “hate speech” they are accusing the whites who don’t want to be offended of not shutting up and not keeping the offense, the migrants, the gay club etc. they are not accusing the liars warmongers but the Russian propaganda, this is the time we all have to defend Zuckerberg because the tone of this disgusting mafia sony WSJ movie that means the rotten post NeoCons who want WW3 with Russia and Iran and possibly also China what they are accusing Zuckerberg of, is of… NOT censoring us.
I have enough of black people pushed as “good ones” in white movies, me I am not Spike Lee nor Bill Cosby, they had Bill Cosby to do movies with Blacks as protagonists that would be likely successful and they arrested him over spectacularly fake rape accusations, Spike Lee doesn’t work, I have no knowledge of white people who have fantasies with black protagonists, it is not true that after arresting the black authors they try to push the white authors to race-swap the protagonists of their movies: we never have fantasies where the protagonist is black, or maybe almost never, me I mentally cast the Splinter Cell Ken Marshall Movie Fantasy and I chose Christian Bale for Ken Marshall and Charlie Hunnam for his best pal Tom Robson a colleague special force operative, what do you want? I just don’t have the money and the capacity to make it, but in the mind the protagonists are almost all white, let alone the girls, I had cast Doutzen Kroes for femme fatale, love affair of Ken, and Evan Peters for Big Tech Billionaire co-owner of the Smart-Phone Company under attack and boyfriend / ex-boyfriend of Doutzen, and a sexy brunette similar to Sherilyn Fenn’s Audrey for jail-bait who tries to go with Ken and ruin him, I have to make an effort to give Blacks and Asians some extra supportive roles, that’s my fantasy. BUT you had Bill Cosby and Spike Lee why did you arrest them? You don’t arrest Cosby who produced original successful stuff where the Whites were supportive and the Blacks were protagonists because that was his true fantasy and then race swap Athena, Helen of Troy and MJ of Spiderman, that’s irritating, you could have new stuff but you arrested the authors. Why?
Ah yeah for rape. By luck Zukcerberg is not accused of rape.
As for Instagram, they accused him even of having a too nice design that generates addiction in minors.
I am not a minor and I am not addicted to Instagram, perhaps I check it a couple of minutes daily and I do appreciate that the design is very pretty.
They did the Social Network under Obama and they are at it, even worse, now: it smells like the NYT’s attack on Weinstein, with the lovers non lovers and secretary grilfriends non girlfriends: all of a sudden after telling him “I love you” for sort of 10 years consequently they informed him that it was rape, by luck Mark hasn’t got that vice, so the attack focuses on us, of letting “white suprematists” & generally non leftwingers talk.
Why should the drag queens be free to talk and we not be free to talk?
Why should the Black Lives Matter be free to talk and not us? Or the white angry?
Why it’s allegedly we the radicalised and not the black lives matter?
Why is this not as big as Rodney King or Geoge Floyd Beating?
It’s shit.
WE have to defend Mark now and we have to defend our freedom.
Do you know the latest news from Instagram?
Christian Craighead’s autobiographic action book One Man In, shunned by the UK authorities, and not promoted by NYT and NYP, and ignored by Lord Murdoch’s media, only via Amazon and Youtube and Instragram, with Shawn Ryan’s help on YouTube it is already sold out and Amazon raised the price to 30 dollars.
Who needs them? The NYP & NYT? And WSJ?
Ask Bezos & Amazon what can you only or almost only with Social Media, even if the DailyMail and The Telegraph had given the news that the book existed and the British Defence Secretary had prohibited it, that’s true, the DM and DT did not ignore it, and I don’t pretend there’s no difference, I read the news on the Daily Mail in fact.
The anti Russian warmonger?
They’re losing it.
They lost it.
And now they want Mark’s head, and after his they’ll want the other social media’s CEO’s heads, they want back the time of the fake feud NYT Vs NYP, forget about it, God save us.
Forza Mark, I’m with you.
Paola