I didn’t know whether to translate the latest article I wrote in Italian on F&FI Click Here whose title sounds like this:
“I’ D LIKE TO BE CLEAR, FOR MY AND YOUR INTEREST, CERTAIN MEDIA MAKE YOU BELIEVE THAT THE SAFEEST CHOICES ARE THE DANGER (Vannacci) AND THE VERY DANGEROUS CHOICES ARE SAFE: MELONI, CALENDA, MARINA BERLUSCONI CONTINUE TO DRAG US TO WAR. I AM PUSHING DSP, OR VANNACCI.”
But somehow the article was too Italian oriented, and F&FW is not F&FI translated in English, it precedes F&FI and it is meant for an International English Speaking audience, if I do some precise translations is just because I think it can be either interesting or relevant for the entire World or West at least. But certain things in the article could easily be applied to other European and Western Countries so I decided to use it, to use the Italian specific situation as a mirror image of what’s going on in the West, what I say for Vannacci and Rizzo can be easily applied to AfD, Farage, Lowe anyway LePen and Bardella, Swedish Democrats etc. Take it for a mirror image, because the game they play: to make you believe that the safest choice is the danger, the decency is the scandal, and the very dangerous destructive choice (The Middle-Left) is the “moderate” and the “safe” decision, this game of talking the other way round, like a psychopath, is the same all across the West.
So, this is it:
I’m trying to be as clear as possible and I hope, if not for Marco Rizzo, whom I’ll vote for and whose words I’ll let you hear, then at least that Vannacci will succeed, and that he will succeed well. Why, with these Pariolini and Miss Garbatella people, whom certain television stations pass off as “safe,” “moderate,” while sounding the alarm about extremism for a Vannacci who is actually very politically similar to the DC and PSI of 1989 (when did they ever take in illegal immigrants? When were illegal immigrants not repatriated? When was it ever taught that being gay and trans is normal in schools? Is this extremism?) And not only that: when have we stopped buying gas from Russia to leave our cars at home, spending half salary to go to work or send the kids from home to school and back, and see the price of fuel double and the price of pizza, groceries, and everything go up? So, on what basis is Vannacci dangerous? He’s dangerous to whom? Vannacci is probably the safest choice, not the most dangerous. Marina Berlusconi’s concept of risk, extremism, and danger, and perhaps her brother’s and her followers’s in general, who want war against Putin and a closure to Russia, that’s dangerous. Letting immigrants in is dangerous, as it is not repatriating them and blocking arrivals. But let’s hear from Rizzo, and see who is convinced, if anyone is convinced:
Carlo Calenda, the daddy’s boy of Italian politics… now I’m speaking!
MARCO RIZZO (Translated): Let’s talk about Carlo Calenda, let’s talk a little. Carlo Calenda, so to speak, is what you might call a daddy’s boy, from the paradigmatic point of view. You see it in his expressions, you see it in his history, in his story. But he’s a daddy’s boy who, so to speak, has a certain grit, wants to lead us to war, is motivated, has the aplomb of someone who has donned a helmet ready to fight. But is that really the case? The issues of war and peace are fundamental to humanity. The Pope is right when he says that war is the greatest danger, and we have never come, as we do today, close to the possibility of a nuclear war, therefore the disappearance of the entire planet, or at least the destruction of the whole of Europe, where we live. So why does Calenda get so angry? Maybe it’s a character issue? I don’t know, but his character certainly leaves something to be desired in terms of, let’s say, commitment. Because who would go to die and fight? Him? The Parioli Brigade? – Parioli is a posh neighbourhood in Rome where Calenda lives near the luxurious and vetero Aristocratic Villa Borghese ed notes – No, our children should go, and perhaps we should evaluate what’s really happening in the world. Soldiers who know the atrocities of war are against it. I, in all my modesty, am for Italy’s neutrality. Indeed, we should, from our constitutional neutrality, also grow economically, as Switzerland does, as Austria does, as some other countries around the world do. Why take sides today when there’s so much difficulty in understanding?
Let’s bring back our soldiers from abroad, let’s defend our borders, let’s raise the salaries of our Police Forces and our Military. We are not being invaded by the Russians, Calenda. We are being invaded by immigrants, by those who arrive as an industrial reserve army. You also served as Minister with little economic success; you were in that very sector. There are still workers who are ready to chase you, but not to hand you a baton, to say goodbye in another way. So let’s talk about the concrete reality, not so much your experience, which doesn’t exist, but the concrete issue of war and peace. You cannot speak this way to push us to war. Italy doesn’t need war. Italy needs internal security, security at its borders, not integration, as you call it, but assimilation for foreign workers, who have arrived in large, disproportionate numbers. Because this is an industrial reserve army that undermines the rights of Italian workers and eliminates the welfare state for our nation. You should be dealing with this, Calenda, but instead talk about war and peace, about exporting democracy, about Western values. Where are the Western values? But you don’t see what’s happening in the streets, in the stations, but you don’t see how even our characteristic, the Christian one—socialism is born from Christianity—is being erased. Deal with these things, these contradictions, Calenda. Take off that helmet. Besides, Parioli doesn’t need a helmet. If anything, cashmere is needed, but now it’s hot and there’s also, so to speak, climate change. Another lie you like a lot too, Calenda.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
To do Calenda a favor, Meloni has him compile electoral lists without collecting signatures. In exchange for what? Help in the war against Putin? Or when they have to vote to give more of our money to Ukraine? Calenda will proudly add his vote. They are both unpresentable, Meloni and Calenda; they are the unpresentable ones, they are the dangerous choice. Far from moderate. Where’s the moderation in giving all these billions to Zelensky? Isn’t Vannacci safer? And I used the word safe. For us, Vannacci is safer, Rizzo is safe but he wants to leave the EU, because someone has to try to do it all, and I agree, but for someone else this is risking going it alone, a complete turnaround, but I don’t know who is safer: Meloni or even Calenda. They don’t care about ordinary people. They don’t care about the truth, the price of gas, or going to war. They have unpresentable resumes; they’ve been lying since birth. Vannacci exudes a sense of security, not extremism, I think. Extremism of what? The extremism of the DC, of preferences: choosing really your own candidates from a list and not having to vote the darling of the Party Leader as “your” representative, of closing the door to the gay lobby, of not going to war with Putin, and of appointing competent people to Ministries, not those with doctored resumes (or those fundamentally and scandalously subpar and below the basic requirements for the role, which is a characteristic of Meloni’s appointments). Or do they think what they did at Mediaset with Alfonso Signorini – a Gay elderly man who worked as Top Starlets Recruiter in Berlusconi’s Tv accused of sexually molesting boys and men as pre-requisite to work in their Media Industry ed notes – do they think what Signorini did is normal, and they blame Vannacci for not doing it, btw? We all want to stop the Gay Storm. Get over it.